#50's new engine 91% installed!

Post progress reports on your project truck(s)

Moderator: FORDification

User avatar
fireguywtc
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3682
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 7:37 pm
Location: North Alabama

Re: #50's new engine 50% installed!

Post by fireguywtc »

I have doubts too Robroy, but it's almost impossible to tell without seeing in person. If it makes you feel any better, your pain will help me with my oil pan selection in the future.
Bill
1967 F-250 LWB 2WD 352 V8, 4spd manual, true duals, 122k original miles (currently being restored)
1970 F-250 4x4 highboy ranger 390 V8, 4spd
2012 F-350 PSD FX4 LWB CC lariat, white
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... hp?uid=602
"If you want to judge a person's true character, give them power."
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: #50's new engine 50% installed!

Post by robroy »

fireguywtc wrote:I have doubts too Robroy, but it's almost impossible to tell without seeing in person.
Yeah! Thankfully I'll be there in person tomorrow morning to check it out. I have a fantasy about having #50 at home one day, and just walking out in the yard whenever I want to check things out. It's a bummer keeping the project fifty miles away.
If it makes you feel any better, your pain will help me with my oil pan selection in the future.
You know, that actually does make me feel a little better! Thanks for mentioning it!

I like the idea of this special "off road" oil pan, and I like the large eight quart capacity. Hopefully it will work out!

Thanks Bill!
Robroy
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: #50's new engine 50% installed!

Post by robroy »

Well, the oil pan hits the steering after all! I'm glad I discovered this now instead of after the truck was put all together. I started a tech thread on this issue here: http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... &sk=t&sd=a.

I wanted a separate thread to track that issue since it will have greater visibility in the engine area than it will being tucked away in this project updates thread.

Thanks for all the superb help!
Robroy
User avatar
rjewkes
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3711
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Missouri, Webb City
Contact:

Re: #50's new engine 50% installed!

Post by rjewkes »

wonder what happens if miloddon has a 5-6 qt capacity pan that won't hit the steering? heck it might even make the trans clearance with the cab problem go away too. if the big idea of the rear sump is ease/cleanliness of oil changes and higher cappacity, wat about an 5-8 qt front sump with a drain plug in front of the cross member?

what about a stock oil pan with a new drain valve/plug in front of the crossmember? like the kits for putting a drain hole/plug in the transmission pan?
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt." - Mark Twain
'70 f250 4x4 Crew cab 460/C6 '72 F100 390/C6 9.8 MPG AVG. '89 Mercury Cougar LS Dual Exh. V6 . 18.9 MPG AVG. In Town.
Image
I don't want to give em a heart-attack. That is what would happen if I answered the door in the buff. Heck it almost scares me to death when I step out of the shower and look in the mirror.~Mancar1~
fuelly.com
User avatar
Ranchero50
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5799
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Maryland, Hagerstown
Contact:

Re: #50's new engine 50% installed!

Post by Ranchero50 »

Well, at this point I feel it would be best to pull the trany and bellhousing back off and drop the motor down onto the mounts to see if the pan hits the steering. You may or may not be ok with the new mounts. Is good old Steve going to buy you the correct pan for your application if this one doesn't fit? Not returnable once installed (been there). The oil filter works the same no matter how it's mounted, they all have a spring loaded flap so once the filter clogs it'll still flow oil and they also have a check valve to keep the oil from draining back into the oil pan. If you lifters tap on startup usually the checkvalve isn't working in the filter. Fram was notorious for this becasue they used a cardboard flap, Ford filers use a rubber flap that works much better.

Jamie
'70 F-350 CS Cummins 6BT 10klb truck 64k mile Bahama Blue

Contact me for CNC Dome Lamp Bezels and Ash Tray pulls.
User avatar
flyboy2610
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4901
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Nebraska, Lincoln

Re: #50's new engine 50% installed!

Post by flyboy2610 »

robroy wrote: It seems that the clearance between the bottom of the filter and the main crossmember under the oil pan is pretty tight on 4x2's.
Robroy
I had the same problem on my '68 F100, with a car 390. The filter would impact the cross member. Came out of the house one morning and had a BIG OLE puddle of oil under the truck!
Went to my favorite auto parts tore and the old guy behind the counter said "You need a 3/4 quart Dodge filter. Same threads, but a little shorter."
Ran one of those filters until I parked the truck for good. (It's my bump trailer, now!)
Some filters that will fit are: Purolator L-20081, AC PF20, Wix 51068, Fram PH43, NAPA 1068, Chrysler 3549957, and Hastings LF196.
Last edited by flyboy2610 on Sun May 24, 2009 2:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy."
Red Green

If you're going to live like there's no hell...............
you'd better be right.
http://theworldasiseeit-flyboy2610.blog ... ee-it.html
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: #50's new engine 60% installed!

Post by robroy »

RJewkes, Jamie, and Flyboy2610, thanks for replying!
rjewkes wrote:wonder what happens if miloddon has a 5-6 qt capacity pan that won't hit the steering?
It seems that they do! That's covered in this thread: http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 4&start=15
rjewkes wrote:heck it might even make the trans clearance with the cab problem go away too.
Indeed it could help, but by the sound of it, it seems like lots of folks with stock pans have the same transmission clearance issue.
rjewkes wrote:if the big idea of the rear sump is ease/cleanliness of oil changes and higher cappacity, wat about an 5-8 qt front sump with a drain plug in front of the cross member?
That's probably the way I'll wind up going.
rjewkes wrote:what about a stock oil pan with a new drain valve/plug in front of the crossmember? like the kits for putting a drain hole/plug in the transmission pan?
Yeah I think that's a smart plan! I'll make sure to arrange for a drain hole that's not right over the crossmember, whichever way I go.
Ranchero50 wrote:Well, at this point I feel it would be best to pull the trany and bellhousing back off and drop the motor down onto the mounts to see if the pan hits the steering. You may or may not be ok with the new mounts.
Hey Jamie! You know, the pan that's on there today isn't even supposed to fit; Milodon says on their site that it's only for 4x4's and vans. So I don't think there's any mystery there. Regarding whether or not I'm OK with the new mounts, that remains to be seen; I'll start another thread with a specific question on that topic.
Ranchero50 wrote:Is good old Steve going to buy you the correct pan for your application if this one doesn't fit?
Yes he is! Steve said that I should e-mail him with whatever pan/pickup/tray I want and he'll buy it and have it all shipped right to me. Then I can return the existing pan to him once I've received the new parts. Pretty nice huh?
Ranchero50 wrote:Not returnable once installed (been there).
Yeah I'm sure that's how it would be if I'd bought the pan myself in the first place.
Ranchero50 wrote:The oil filter works the same no matter how it's mounted, they all have a spring loaded flap so once the filter clogs it'll still flow oil and they also have a check valve to keep the oil from draining back into the oil pan. If you lifters tap on startup usually the checkvalve isn't working in the filter. Fram was notorious for this becasue they used a cardboard flap, Ford filers use a rubber flap that works much better.
Very interesting; thanks for that info!
flyboy2610 wrote:
robroy wrote: It seems that the clearance between the bottom of the filter and the main crossmember under the oil pan is pretty tight on 4x2's.
Robroy
I had the same problem on my '68 F100, with a car 390. The filter would impact the cross member. Came out of the house one morning and had a BIG OLE puddle of oil under the truck!
Went to my favorite auto parts tore and the old guy behind the counter said "You need a 3/4 quart Dodge filter. Same threads, but a little shorter."
Ran one of those filters until I parked the truck for good. (It's my bump trailer, now!)
Some filters that will fit are: Purolator L-20081, AC PF20, Wix 51068, Fram PH43, NAPA 1068, Chrysler 3549957, and Hastings LF196.
Flyboy2610, thank you for all those part numbers! I'll probably go the same way you went on this and get one of these other filters. Probably the Wix 51068. That's really nice of you to provide all the part numbers!

Here's how close the existing filter comes to the frame. It's too close to easily fit a filter wrench around.

Image

I removed it to make room for putting the motor mounts together. Here it is:

Image
Image
Image

And here's how that area looked after removing it:

Image

The engine install project as it looked today:

Image
Image

Thanks for all the excellent advice!
Robroy
User avatar
marvin2
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:25 am

Re: #50's new engine 60% installed!

Post by marvin2 »

Looking good. Keep up the good work!
Image
1970 F100 "Marvin 2" - Crown Vic IFS, 302, C4 (work in progress)
1970 F250 "Leonard" - 302, C6 (project in waiting)
1971 F100 "Walt" - 302, 3-speed on the column (Sunday driver)
2004 Mustang GT "Horse With No Name" - 4.6L, 5 speed (Retired daily driver / Friday driver)
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: #50's new engine 60% installed!

Post by robroy »

Thanks Marvin2!
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: #50's new engine 60% installed!

Post by robroy »

FlyBoy2610, thanks again for the stubby oil filter part numbers. The WIX 51068 worked out perfectly!

Image
Image

Here it is next to the filter installed by Proformance Unlimited, which is the stock size.

Image
Image
Image

The truck with the factory filter:

Image

The truck with the WIX 51068:

Image

The old filter's clearance:

Image

The WIX 51068 clearance:

Image

It is now perfect! An oil filter wrench slips over the end easily. Thanks very much FlyBoy2610!

Robroy
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: #50's new engine 76% installed!

Post by robroy »

A lot has happened over the past months with many new threads! But I thought I'd update this one with a current photo of the engine. It won't be too long now before it's fired up!

Image
http://www.robroygregg.com/Number50/IMG_3936s.JPG

Robroy
User avatar
JeffSk63
New Member
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 10:10 am
Location: Bethany Mo

Re: #50's new engine 76% installed!

Post by JeffSk63 »

very nice looking motor!!!! :woohoo:
1969 f100 Ranger
1995 Bronco
Jeff
Fordnatic
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 274
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 7:29 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: #50's new engine 76% installed!

Post by Fordnatic »

That's BEAUTIFUL!!!
70F100: 410 Merc with tri-power, close ratio toploader, 4.56 detroit locker 9"
68F100 4x4: 390, 4 spd/NP 205, Rancho 4" urethane susp, 35x12.50 All Terrain T/A's
55F100
01F150 Daily Driver: TP tunes, AF1 intake, elec fans, Magnaflow exh, underdrive pulleys, Centerlines
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Re: #50's new engine 76% installed!

Post by robroy »

Hey JeffSk63 and Fordnatic, thanks for replying!

Yes it's nice looking now--but wait and see how it will look after 30,000 miles, or 50,000 miles. I probably won't be spending too much time under the hood keeping it immaculate, if that were even possible to do.

Thanks again!
Robroy
Calvin Gunter
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 483
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 2:26 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: #50's new engine 76% installed!

Post by Calvin Gunter »

Yeah robroy I hear what your saying about not keeping it immaculate after it's running but I don't believe you.HaHa,after all that work you've done you'll be so proud you'll be wiping it down all the time.Mine is not nearly that nice and I still wipe it down under the hood quite often.Looks good,keep up the good work,Calvin
1967 Ranger,Short bed,390,C-6,9 inch,4 BBL.,intake,cam,headers,3:55 Posi.,A/C,Power steering,Power Disc Brakes,Automatic trans.DJM dropped I-beams,flipped rear hangers,headlight harness upgrade.ExTang tonneau cover "Old Blue".
http://s508.photobucket.com/albums/s328/BigSxy96/
1967 Base model,352,2bbl.,3 on the tree,short bed,3:25 9 inch "Rusty".
1967 Mustang coupe-show car/garage queen.Small Block,alum. heads,Nitrous,4:11Locker,Areospace brakes "Mystang".
1996 F-250 Powerstroke-Big intake,exhaust,injectors.(Nice Smoke Show) "Big Sexy"
Post Reply