"vintage" intakes

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

Post Reply
User avatar
bigredball90
New Member
New Member
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: florida

"vintage" intakes

Post by bigredball90 »

Is there a website or does anyone have some info on special intakes particularly for windsors? I think when I get my motor done (very soon) I want to put old speed items on it. But I dont know where to look to find some good stuff.
Thanks for any info!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayI ... 3DWatching
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayI ... 3DWatching
no truck just a merkur...
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8050
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by FORDification »

It's just my opinion, but you'd probably be spending more money for old outdated technology that won't give you the performance of less-expensive modern choices. Personally, I think you'd be much happier leaving the '60s speed parts to the restoration crowd, where they're more interested in correct casting and code numbers than performance, and stick with items that have an additional 40 years worth of revisions and improvements.

However, you can check out this link for some basic info on vintage Ford intakes:

http://mustangtek.com/FordIntake.html
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by fordman »

that 302 intake wont fit on a 351w.
User avatar
Thunderfoot
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2207
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Idaho, Boise

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by Thunderfoot »

fordman wrote:that 302 intake wont fit on a 351w.
The 221, 255, 260, 289-302 are also considered Windsors as the 351W is...

But yeah clarification on which size motor you are working with in the Windsor family is needed as the 351W uses a different/larger intake then the others...
Also, for the 351W there really is no early performance intakes for them... :2cents:
Shayne
I'm not "Brand Loyal" Ford-Chevy-Dodge-Toyota I have them all, one even cross mixed...
If it Looks good and Works good then it's ok by me. Everything has its issues from time to time...

69 SWB (project) & 69 Highboy (driver/project)
http://s197.photobucket.com/albums/aa29 ... d%20truck/
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10399
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4925
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by DuckRyder »

The Shelby intake is a good intake, the other one no so much.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
User avatar
bigredball90
New Member
New Member
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: florida

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by bigredball90 »

Very true, I knew from the beginning that I wouldnt be getting the shelby intake just thought It would be cool. But others that wont go for so much would be nice to have as future parts, or to use right now. Im also looking at a couple of valve covers but havnt found anything I like yet. By the way what web sites do you go to?
no truck just a merkur...
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4925
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by DuckRyder »

Provided the rest of the engine can use the air, that Shelby intake will trounce a performer. It is approximately equal to a Weiand stealth (Notice an similarities in design?) or Ederbrock Performer RPM. Blue thunder makes a very fine reproduction, although it is not inexpensive.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
Pipes71
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 275
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 8:21 am
Location: New Jersey

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by Pipes71 »

DuckRyder wrote:Provided the rest of the engine can use the air, that Shelby intake will trounce a performer. It is approximately equal to a Weiand stealth (Notice an similarities in design?) or Ederbrock Performer RPM. Blue thunder makes a very fine reproduction, although it is not inexpensive.
:doh: yeah I was thinking rpm, just forgot to type the rpm.. Im running the rpm intake and performer rpm heads on the stroker in my 68 mustang.
Tony
bumpless but still diggin them....
User avatar
papabug71
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2002
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:31 pm
Location: McAlester, Oklahoma

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by papabug71 »

I was looking into the same thing not too long ago for my 302. I found with the old intakes, they are expensive, & all the ones I looked at had something wrong with them (ebay). Broken tabs, stripped threads, helicoils etc.

Right now im looking into the Weiand manifolds. They almost look stock, & I bet if you painted or powdercoated one, folks wouldnt know the difference. On the MoPar site im on, guys that are making the "sleeper" motors will get an aftermarket manifold & use a 120 grit sanding wheel & carefully grind off all the aftermarket markings. Brand, model # , etc. Then they hit it with some 400 grit to smooth it up, paint it & you would never know it wasnt factory equipment.

Im not sure on how you plan to dress your engine, but here are some cool factory looking valve covers. If your into chrome that is.

http://www.scottdrake.net/prod_details. ... alve+Cover
Image
Matt
1971 F-100 Sport Custom - My grandpaws truck
Been in the family since 10/3/'71 (Brand spankin' new)
Mine since 5/7/'94
302 / 3 speed / 3:25's
--Currently undergoing full frame off resto/mod--
User avatar
bigredball90
New Member
New Member
Posts: 187
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 12:26 pm
Location: florida

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by bigredball90 »

Those look like what I have now but not chrome. For now Im going to stay away from chrome but possibly do it later on. Sanding em down is a good idea never thought of that...
no truck just a merkur...
User avatar
papabug71
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2002
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:31 pm
Location: McAlester, Oklahoma

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by papabug71 »

bigredball90 wrote: Sanding em down is a good idea never thought of that...
Leave it up to the MoPar guys to come up with it. :zz:
Image
Matt
1971 F-100 Sport Custom - My grandpaws truck
Been in the family since 10/3/'71 (Brand spankin' new)
Mine since 5/7/'94
302 / 3 speed / 3:25's
--Currently undergoing full frame off resto/mod--
Fordtastic
New Member
New Member
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 6:38 pm
Location: Anacortes, Washington

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by Fordtastic »

edlebrock f4b is what i have on my truck.. its old school from what i have read when i googled it. It cleaned up pretty nice with a dremel
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
'72 F100 302 4sp manual
User avatar
rjewkes
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3711
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Missouri, Webb City
Contact:

Re: "vintage" intakes

Post by rjewkes »

yeah I'd shave the wieght of the stock/old aftermarket performance intakes and get the lower weight aluminum ones, and even at that I'd get a used 302 EFI setup lock stock and barrell and build it for the extra milaege and mod the trans crossmember to fit the early AOD Tranny.

that would be different and still be a 302. Wouldn't it shock any local/state smog inspector that your old ford got 15-20 maybe 22 mpgs and polluted less then they think it should?
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt." - Mark Twain
'70 f250 4x4 Crew cab 460/C6 '72 F100 390/C6 9.8 MPG AVG. '89 Mercury Cougar LS Dual Exh. V6 . 18.9 MPG AVG. In Town.
Image
I don't want to give em a heart-attack. That is what would happen if I answered the door in the buff. Heck it almost scares me to death when I step out of the shower and look in the mirror.~Mancar1~
fuelly.com
Post Reply