data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2849/e284981e502788031360fa258be3ab680dfae444" alt="Thumbs up :thup:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e013c/e013cb5dbf3f9adc7435da67edd1e1d06e7d02f4" alt="Laughing :lol:"
Moderator: FORDification
Mancar1 wrote:Also, there is a sock company in Indiana, 4 Bare feet, or I think thats the name. Have a bunch of socks from them. They are of course made in the USA. It is hard sometimes to find made in the USA products. At least I know where my wood work projects are made.![]()
Ive seen a lot of $10 feet at Walmart. Well then again Ive seen a lot of $10 people there too.BobbyFord wrote: If you got $10 shoes, you got $10 feet.
Racer Z wrote:Oil companies fall into a similar category. We support what we complain about by continuing to buy more oil and gasoline. If we were serious about our complaints, we would stop driving our gas guzzling cars and trucks and start pedaling bicycles. We (well I don't) talk as if the oil companies should be shut down, without realizing the impact that would have on our society.71highboy wrote:its all politics.if you have enough money the government wont do anything.walmart-oil companies you all now where im coming from.how tomes have changed.and not for the better.
Take a look around at your own life and the items in it. How many things do you have that are petroleum based? Polyester; Lexan; Fiberglass resin; Nylon stockings, The frames of your glasses; Credit and debit cards; Styrofoam take-out containers; Plastic flatware; Grocery bags; Trash bags; My computer mouse and keyboard; Half of a new car;
Where does it stop? How many of those items can you live without? Or would convenience be compromised?
I confess. My life would come to a screeching halt if petroleum disappeared overnight.
robroy wrote:Good day,
China's a special interest of mine, and I've thought about the points being made in this thread often.
To establish the depth of my interest (I don't mean to boast): Mandarin Chinese is my second language. I began studying with a native Chinese speaker at Cabrillo College in Aptos, California in 1996, and have continued on my own ever since. I chose to learn the traditional (pre-1950's) writing system instead of the modern simplified system, and I speak with a Beijing accent. My speech comprehension, pronunciation, grammar and reading are good, and my writing's excellent (I've been surprised to hear that it's much better than most Chinese people's).
Working in the computer industry has also put me in close proximity to many Chinese people and Chinese-Americans, and I've had lots of enjoyable conversations with them about China's history, culture, economy and language.
In recent weeks I've been listening to recorded class lectures by Kenneth J. Hammond, Ph.D., called From Yao to Mao: 5000 Years of Chinese History. Reviewing the ABCs of Chinese history has given me some new thoughts on what may be going on today with imported Chinese stuff.
I hope y'all are having a fantastic week!!!
- [Not related to the recording...] Every Chinese person with whom I've spoken has agreed that most imported Chinese products are--with some notable exceptions--of grossly substandard quality. This isn't just an American perspective.
- I've heard from Dr. Hammond that for most of China's long history, China was the greatest world power (with the exception of major civil war periods every ~30-to-300 years). In fact, Marco Polo's notes from his first trip to China described a land so rich, vast, powerful and sophisticated that his fellow Venetians called his notes, "The Million," meaning that his notes were nothing more than a million lies--yet other historical accounts support his notes.
- China's dominant world position was maintained until the early nineteenth century, and its regression was caused by a combination of mass opium addiction (introduced to China when British trading began) and the rapid advances made to military technology in the West. So China's world position has been unusually depressed for the last two centuries.
My own thoughts on this: given how long China has been around, this depression's duration has been relatively brief, yet it's the only China that most Americans know. Thus, the Chinese import phenomenon could be viewed not as a new trend, but as a gradual return to a condition that once was.- Dr. Hammond seems to believe that China's in the process of recovering its position as a dominant (if not the dominant) world power, just as it was for thousands of years prior to the nineteenth century.
Robroy
robroy wrote:Good day,
China's a special interest of mine, and I've thought about the points being made in this thread often.
To establish the depth of my interest (I don't mean to boast): Mandarin Chinese is my second language. I began studying with a native Chinese speaker at Cabrillo College in Aptos, California in 1996, and have continued on my own ever since. I chose to learn the traditional (pre-1950's) writing system instead of the modern simplified system, and I speak with a Beijing accent. My speech comprehension, pronunciation, grammar and reading are good, and my writing's excellent (I've been surprised to hear that it's much better than most Chinese people's).
Working in the computer industry has also put me in close proximity to many Chinese people and Chinese-Americans, and I've had lots of enjoyable conversations with them about China's history, culture, economy and language.
but if it keeps up we will all be speaking chinese.![]()
In recent weeks I've been listening to recorded class lectures by Kenneth J. Hammond, Ph.D., called From Yao to Mao: 5000 Years of Chinese History. Reviewing the ABCs of Chinese history has given me some new thoughts on what may be going on today with imported Chinese stuff.
I hope y'all are having a fantastic week!!!
- [Not related to the recording...] Every Chinese person with whom I've spoken has agreed that most imported Chinese products are--with some notable exceptions--of grossly substandard quality. This isn't just an American perspective.
- I've heard from Dr. Hammond that for most of China's long history, China was the greatest world power (with the exception of major civil war periods every ~30-to-300 years). In fact, Marco Polo's notes from his first trip to China described a land so rich, vast, powerful and sophisticated that his fellow Venetians called his notes, "The Million," meaning that his notes were nothing more than a million lies--yet other historical accounts support his notes.
- China's dominant world position was maintained until the early nineteenth century, and its regression was caused by a combination of mass opium addiction (introduced to China when British trading began) and the rapid advances made to military technology in the West. So China's world position has been unusually depressed for the last two centuries.
My own thoughts on this: given how long China has been around, this depression's duration has been relatively brief, yet it's the only China that most Americans know. Thus, the Chinese import phenomenon could be viewed not as a new trend, but as a gradual return to a condition that once was.- Dr. Hammond seems to believe that China's in the process of recovering its position as a dominant (if not the dominant) world power, just as it was for thousands of years prior to the nineteenth century.
Robroy