interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

No tech discussion, please

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
emeraldcoupe
New Member
New Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 11:42 pm

interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by emeraldcoupe »

on a reg cab, how much difference,if any, is there as far as interior room,leg room,etc between the 67-72 and the 80-96 trucks? i'm 6' 1" and want to build a bump as a dd.
User avatar
Ranchero50
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5799
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Maryland, Hagerstown
Contact:

Re: interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by Ranchero50 »

The older stuff is a couple inches shorter to the dash and wheel. Our trucks were designed for a tougher working crowd, manual steering needed a larger wheel closer to your chest and brakes needed all the help they could get. The dents started the longer cab trend.

As far as a DD goes, when my '71 F250 was on the road I didn't mind driving it and I'm 6'7" or so. The truck was actually a pretty comfortable no frills ride in traffic and on the interstate. The only real limit is these things were built to run 50mph and the old 360 was buzzing at 70 on the interstate.
'70 F-350 CS Cummins 6BT 10klb truck 64k mile Bahama Blue

Contact me for CNC Dome Lamp Bezels and Ash Tray pulls.
emeraldcoupe
New Member
New Member
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 11:42 pm

Re: interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by emeraldcoupe »

thanks. guess i'm going to have to go find a few and sit in them. i figure a 302 or 351 with an overdrive and ac should do pretty good and tow my car as well.
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Re: interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by averagef250 »

I'm 6'3 and always thought bumps are a great fit for taller guys. They actually have leg room, your knees aren't crammed against the dash. The Ford seats are pretty comfy too.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
1972hiboy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2421
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:44 pm
Location: California, Santa Cruz

Re: interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by 1972hiboy »

averagef250 wrote:I'm 6'3 and always thought bumps are a great fit for taller guys. They actually have leg room, your knees aren't crammed against the dash. The Ford seats are pretty comfy too.
Exactly, im 6'2 and I enjoy the leg room. I like having the steering wheel closer to my chest so im not slouching to reach for the wheel. I can maintain a very comfortable and good driving posture.
Rich
1973 f350 super c/s 460/c6 22k orig miles
1972 f350 srw crewcab special 390
1972 f250 4x4 sport custom 390fe Red
1972 f250 4x4 custom 360 FE " Ranger Ric"
1972 f250 4x4 custom 84k og miles 390
1971 f250 4x4 sport custom 56k og miles. 360
1970 f250 4x4 428 fe hp60 205 d60
Dont eat yellow snow.....
User avatar
TexasTruck72
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 316
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 12:04 pm
Location: Green Level, North Carolina

Re: interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by TexasTruck72 »

1972hiboy wrote:
averagef250 wrote:I'm 6'3 and always thought bumps are a great fit for taller guys. They actually have leg room, your knees aren't crammed against the dash. The Ford seats are pretty comfy too.
Exactly, im 6'2 and I enjoy the leg room. I like having the steering wheel closer to my chest so im not slouching to reach for the wheel. I can maintain a very comfortable and good driving posture.
:yt: Me too!

I also have a 96 F150(80-96 body style) and it's comfortable but there is less leg room since the floor pans arc upward much sooner. And the trans hump is much bigger.
Jack

1943 Ford GPW Jeep(sold)
1972 F-100 Custom
1976 F-150 Explorer
1996 F-150 Eddie Bauer ed.
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Re: interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by averagef250 »

Also forgot about the cab height/windshield height! Bumps have a nice tall windshield so you're not staring at the windshield seal.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
71rangerxlt-fred
New Member
New Member
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:04 am
Location: Bloomfield, Indiana

Re: interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by 71rangerxlt-fred »

i am 6-2 and i always liked the comfort of these trucks, I have only one thing to add that if you were to change to anything other than the original seat, the angles start to get a little off and gets a bit uncomfortable. The bench seat from a ranger or ranger xlt dent truck has a little bit more foam padding and a bit wider than the bumps, makes em a little more plush.
71 f100 xlt black and white 390 c6
71 f100 xlt 2 tone green 302 c4
79 f250 4x4 460 4 speed
79 f250 4x4 460 auto snow plow special
User avatar
Cipher43
New Member
New Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:31 am
Location: Storm Lake IA

Re: interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by Cipher43 »

Same as everyone above said. I'm 6'3" and I have great head room and leg room. It's not as comfortable to set in the middle with the hump but that is like all trucks
Greg
My Toys
Image...... Image......Image......Image
......1969 F-100................1968 F-250...........................57 S-100 IHC................71 CL350, 73CL450

original 360, T18 tranny, 9" with 3.25s

Project Rejuvenate Bill
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=69060
User avatar
Cipher43
New Member
New Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 7:31 am
Location: Storm Lake IA

Re: interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by Cipher43 »

Double post
Greg
My Toys
Image...... Image......Image......Image
......1969 F-100................1968 F-250...........................57 S-100 IHC................71 CL350, 73CL450

original 360, T18 tranny, 9" with 3.25s

Project Rejuvenate Bill
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=69060
User avatar
kf7mjf
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 354
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:29 pm
Location: Olympia, WA

Re: interior room 67-72 vs 80-96

Post by kf7mjf »

I'm 6'9" and feel comfortable behind the wheel of my 67. That said, I wouldn't mind an extra couple inches, but if I really gave a rip, I could pull out the rear fuel tank, and just use the auxiliary tank.
1967 F-100 Ranger
Post Reply