1967 F100 Resurrection - On The Road Again!

Post progress reports on your project truck(s)

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
User avatar
pincheweddo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:59 pm
Location: Texas, Fort Worth
Contact:

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Gas tank complete

Post by pincheweddo »

Got the gas tank coated and ready to go.

http://1967f100.blogspot.com/2013/09/kr ... ool-d.html

Image
See project updates at:
http://1967f100.blogspot.com
User avatar
pincheweddo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:59 pm
Location: Texas, Fort Worth
Contact:

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Gas tank complete

Post by pincheweddo »

Got the gas tank done and put on some body work this weekend!

http://1967f100.blogspot.com/2013/10/bo ... ssion.html

Image
See project updates at:
http://1967f100.blogspot.com
User avatar
pincheweddo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:59 pm
Location: Texas, Fort Worth
Contact:

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by pincheweddo »

Doesn't appear to be much done since my last post but spent mucho time on the adjustment of the body mounts, panels and switch out the aluminum grill that was bent for the $40 steel one.

http://1967f100.blogspot.com/2013/10/pi ... -song.html

Image
See project updates at:
http://1967f100.blogspot.com
motzingg
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 742
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 1:11 pm
Location: Milwaukee WI

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by motzingg »

lookin' good with the body work on there.

nothing more frustrating and time consuming than shimming/aligning body panels. but if you don't do it, it drives ya crazy.
User avatar
pincheweddo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:59 pm
Location: Texas, Fort Worth
Contact:

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by pincheweddo »

motzingg wrote:lookin' good with the body work on there.

nothing more frustrating and time consuming than shimming/aligning body panels. but if you don't do it, it drives ya crazy.
What I don't get is the bump to bump on the cab is wider than the bump to bump on the bead. They will not match up from driver to passenger side.
See project updates at:
http://1967f100.blogspot.com
User avatar
sargentrs
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 9866
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:30 am
Location: Georgia, Jasper

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by sargentrs »

I believe it is. From looking at this drawing http://www.fordification.com/tech/images/bb70/p143.jpg it appears to be in design. The cab dimensions never got uploaded to the tech section but it looks like it here.
Randy
1970 F100 Sport Custom Limited LWB, 302cid, 3 on the tree. NO A/C, NO P/S, NO P/B. Currently in 1000 pcs while rebuilding. Project thread: http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=59995 Plan: 351w, C4, LSD, pwr front disc, p/s, a/c, bucket seats, new interior and paint.
1987 F-150 XLT Lariat, 5.0/C6 auto.
User avatar
pincheweddo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:59 pm
Location: Texas, Fort Worth
Contact:

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by pincheweddo »

sargentrs wrote:I believe it is. From looking at this drawing http://www.fordification.com/tech/images/bb70/p143.jpg it appears to be in design. The cab dimensions never got uploaded to the tech section but it looks like it here.
Sad thing is that it only took me a few minutes to figure that out and given the situation I sill can't get it centered on the cab after 2 days of work. So the drivers side of the cab is going to stick out more than the passenger side. :dk: If any body asks or mentions it, I will simply say "it's impolite to ask about farm accidents" :oops:
See project updates at:
http://1967f100.blogspot.com
User avatar
sargentrs
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 9866
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:30 am
Location: Georgia, Jasper

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by sargentrs »

pincheweddo wrote:"I will simply say "it's impolite to ask about farm accidents" :oops:
:lol:
Randy
1970 F100 Sport Custom Limited LWB, 302cid, 3 on the tree. NO A/C, NO P/S, NO P/B. Currently in 1000 pcs while rebuilding. Project thread: http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=59995 Plan: 351w, C4, LSD, pwr front disc, p/s, a/c, bucket seats, new interior and paint.
1987 F-150 XLT Lariat, 5.0/C6 auto.
User avatar
pincheweddo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:59 pm
Location: Texas, Fort Worth
Contact:

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by pincheweddo »

See project updates at:
http://1967f100.blogspot.com
User avatar
sargentrs
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 9866
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:30 am
Location: Georgia, Jasper

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by sargentrs »

Looking good, Pinch!
Randy
1970 F100 Sport Custom Limited LWB, 302cid, 3 on the tree. NO A/C, NO P/S, NO P/B. Currently in 1000 pcs while rebuilding. Project thread: http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=59995 Plan: 351w, C4, LSD, pwr front disc, p/s, a/c, bucket seats, new interior and paint.
1987 F-150 XLT Lariat, 5.0/C6 auto.
GOODOLEBOY84
New Member
New Member
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 2:54 pm

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by GOODOLEBOY84 »

what wheels do you have and what sizes, also what tire size? truck looks good, are you keeping the aluminum grille?
User avatar
pincheweddo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:59 pm
Location: Texas, Fort Worth
Contact:

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by pincheweddo »

GOODOLEBOY84 wrote:what wheels do you have and what sizes, also what tire size? truck looks good, are you keeping the aluminum grille?
Going with the steel grill that is on there now. I like the beat up look even though it is dead level straight and doesn't have a dent in it. Rears are 275 R60 15's, Fronts 245 R60 15's. Not sure about the offsets of the wheels. Got them of the donor truck and the tires were on them.
See project updates at:
http://1967f100.blogspot.com
User avatar
pincheweddo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:59 pm
Location: Texas, Fort Worth
Contact:

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by pincheweddo »

Got quite a bit done since my last post. The link below has all of my doings, just scroll down to see it all…

http://1967f100.blogspot.com

Image
See project updates at:
http://1967f100.blogspot.com
User avatar
Nitekruizer
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 545
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 1:43 pm
Location: Manitoba, Canada

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by Nitekruizer »

pincheweddo wrote:
motzingg wrote:lookin' good with the body work on there.

nothing more frustrating and time consuming than shimming/aligning body panels. but if you don't do it, it drives ya crazy.
What I don't get is the bump to bump on the cab is wider than the bump to bump on the bead. They will not match up from driver to passenger side.
It is strange. :? I encountered the same thing with mine. Oh well :lol:

Your truck is turning out very nice! :thup:
390 FE IN A "BUMP" / 383 WEDGE IN A 2 DOOR C-BODY / 351W IN A FULL-SIZE MERCURY / 194 CHEVY 6 IN A DUECE / 2.4 DOHC CHRYSLER IN A PLASTIC BUBBLE (Driver)
User avatar
pincheweddo
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 363
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 11:59 pm
Location: Texas, Fort Worth
Contact:

Re: 1967 F100 Resurrection - Body Work On

Post by pincheweddo »

Nitekruizer wrote:
pincheweddo wrote:
motzingg wrote:lookin' good with the body work on there.

nothing more frustrating and time consuming than shimming/aligning body panels. but if you don't do it, it drives ya crazy.
What I don't get is the bump to bump on the cab is wider than the bump to bump on the bead. They will not match up from driver to passenger side.
It is strange. :? I encountered the same thing with mine. Oh well :lol:

Your truck is turning out very nice! :thup:
Thanks! It's always good to know your not alone.
See project updates at:
http://1967f100.blogspot.com
Post Reply