Still? I would haveFLATBEDFORD wrote:I've only got 3 Rhinelanders left.
![Burp :burp:](./images/smilies/icon_burp.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Moderators: FORDification, 70_F100
I'm saving them.71 LONG BED wrote:Still? I would haveFLATBEDFORD wrote:I've only got 3 Rhinelanders left.already.
I have a similar situation, although I have a 360 w/4-speed, from the way this things screams down the highway I would bet it has 4.5x? rear gears. Since I plan to do some highway driving, (car shows, vacation to shore, joy rides, etc) I think the 3.54 or 3.73 would be up my alley. Now the question is where do I look...Junk yards, Fordification, online, etc.two-bit wrote:Engine is a 390, 4bbl, rated at 280 ft lbs @ 2500RPM/355 ft lbs @ 3500
Option 1 or Option 2.
Option 1...
@ 2500 rpm.....67 mph.....3.54:1 rear end
Option 2...
@ 2500 rpm.....63mph.....3.73:1 rear end
This truck will get used to haul loads up to 6K
and towing up to 8K
I'm leaning towards the 3.73 cause i'm worried about "lugging" my 390 at highway speeds.
Two-bit
Hmmm, maybe a trade is an idea. I could drop the whole rear and bring it out and trade straight up with you. I have 3.25's and want something shorter. I'm looking for quicker starts. You know, something a little more fun.GreyStep wrote:I have a similar situation, although I have a 360 w/4-speed, from the way this things screams down the highway I would bet it has 4.5x? rear gears. Since I plan to do some highway driving, (car shows, vacation to shore, joy rides, etc) I think the 3.54 or 3.73 would be up my alley. Now the question is where do I look...Junk yards, Fordification, online, etc.
JK "GREYSTEP"